Export limit exceeded: 54241 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (54241 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-96280 | 2 Flatpak, Redhat | 5 Flatpak, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 2 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.5 High |
| The OCI delta stream parser read sizes as guint64 but passed them to GLib I/O and allocation functions expecting gsize (32 bits on 32-bit systems), causing undersized allocations while subsequent operations use the original 64-bit size, leading to heap buffer overflows. An attacker controlling an OCI registry can craft a delta stream that triggers this during flatpak install/update, potentially achieving code execution on 32-bit systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84177 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Incorrect behavior order in Apache Wicket: a file path is validated before the framework appends the attributes that complete it. org.apache.wicket.request.resource.PackageResource asks the configured package resource guard about a path built from the scope class' package and the file name in the request URL, and then hands that same path to the resource stream locator together with a style, a variation and a locale. Those three attributes are decoded from the name of the first query parameter and never appear in the string the guard was given. org.apache.wicket.core.util.resource.locator.ResourceNameIterator appends them to that path, each preceded by an underscore, in the order variation, style, locale, before the file extension, so the file that is opened is not the file the guard approved. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.PackageResourceGuard decides whether an HTML file is a component's markup template by looking for a class file of the same name beside it, stripping one underscore-delimited suffix at a time as it goes. HTML is on the default allow list, so that check is the only thing separating a static HTML file, which may be served, from a markup template, which may not. Asked about the name of a template, the guard refuses it correctly. Asked about a shorter name for which no class exists, it accepts, and a style supplied in the URL then completes that name into the markup template of a component class, which is written to the response. An application is affected if the simple name of any of its component classes contains an underscore and no shorter part of that name is itself a class, such as Report_v2 or Wizard_Step1; an application with no such class name is not affected. No unusual deployment, packaging or configuration is required, and running in deployment rather than development mode does not prevent it. Java naming conventions discourage underscores in class names and no module Wicket ships has one, so no framework markup is exposed; what an application exposes this way is its own. A component whose class name has no underscore is not reachable, and neither is its localized or styled markup, because the guard finds the class file under the base name and refuses the request. The attributes cannot change the file extension and cannot leave the component's package, so nothing beyond HTML files in that package is reachable. Access is read-only, and what is disclosed is developer-authored template content: component structure, developer comments, markup that is rendered only under some conditions, inline script, and the endpoints a template names. No user data, credential or session material is reachable this way. An attacker has to name a class in the target package and the component itself, and Wicket writes fully qualified class names into the URL of every package resource it renders. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20595 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In neuropilot, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11263078; Issue ID: MSV-9001. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20590 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In display, there is a possible system crash due to a logic error. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11410704; Issue ID: MSV-9574. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20594 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01349680 / MOLY01369097; Issue ID: MSV-9364. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20596 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01758225; Issue ID: MSV-8910. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20597 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01758223; Issue ID: MSV-8909. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68588 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible way (for XXX) to XXXXX due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01334054 / MOLY01312486; Issue ID: MSV-7920. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100140 | 1 Qt | 2 Qt, Qt5compat | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| An integer overflow vulnerability in the Qt XML parsing (Qt5Compat / QXmlSimpleReader) functionality of Qt. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83559 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Improper encoding or escaping of output in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.core.util.string.JavaScriptUtils#escapeQuotes() replaces each single quote in its input with a backslash and a single quote, and each double quote with a backslash and a double quote, so that the value can be placed inside a JavaScript string literal. It does not escape the backslash, which is the character that has to be escaped, and escaped first, for the rest of that escaping to hold. A value that already holds a backslash immediately before a quote therefore ends up with two backslashes in front of that quote: the first escapes the second, the quote itself is left unescaped, and it closes the literal. Whatever the value carries after that point is no longer text but JavaScript, and it runs in the application's origin and in the session of the user looking at the page. The method is public, is not deprecated, and its documentation states that its result can be part of a JavaScript call such as an alert; the only limitation it notes concerns JSON values, which need different escaping. An application is affected wherever it calls the method itself and places the result inside a JavaScript string literal, from its own code or from a component of its own or of a third party, and the value it escapes holds data an attacker can influence. There is no further condition, and no component of Wicket has to be involved: the application is using the method for what its documentation offers, and the method does not deliver it. Two components shipped with Wicket Extensions pass a value through the method. org.apache.wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.AjaxEditableLabel writes the editor's first error feedback message into a single-quoted JavaScript string literal in the Ajax response, so an application is affected through that component where the message shown for a failed edit holds data an attacker can influence, whether that is the submitted value itself or another variable the application sets on the validation error. A validation message can carry the submitted value, because input is a message variable that every form component supplies for its own validation errors, and the documentation shows overriding a validator's message to include it; none of the message bundles shipped with Wicket interpolates it, so an application that has not written such a message is not affected through this component. org.apache.wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.repeater.AjaxListPanel passes the serialized markup tag of an appended component through the method and is not affected: the tag comes from the panel's own markup file, and a quote in any of its attribute values, the component's markup id included, is written as a character reference by the tag serialization and cannot close the literal. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20560 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01870543; Issue ID: MSV-9070. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68590 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In ip_stack, there is a possible out of bounds read due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01387180; Issue ID: MSV-5152. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20598 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01755742; Issue ID: MSV-8896. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20555 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01876664; Issue ID: MSV-9834. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20561 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01750090; Issue ID: MSV-8908. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20562 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01775984; Issue ID: MSV-8907. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20572 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In adsp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11431442; Issue ID: MSV-9924. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20576 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In afe, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11431385; Issue ID: MSV-9920. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58380 | 3 Gimp, Gnome, Redhat | 5 Gimp, Gimp, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in GIMP's PNM file format parser. When parsing a specially crafted PNM file, the pnmscanner_gettoken() function writes a null terminator one byte past the end of a stack-allocated buffer due to an off-by-one error in the loop boundary check. This could lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42169 | 2 Gimp, Redhat | 5 Gimp, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 2 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.3 High |
| A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists in the APNG (Animated PNG) file loader of GIMP. This flaw occurs when the `fcTL` width exceeds the `IHDR` width, leading to pixel data being written past the end of a heap allocation. Additionally, a heap-based buffer overflow exists in the DDS plug-in due to a BPP mismatch in the `load_layer()` function. Both vulnerabilities can be triggered by opening a specially crafted image file, potentially leading to code execution. | ||||