Export limit exceeded: 24370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24370 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22018 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Node.js, affecting users of the experimental permission model when the --allow-fs-read flag is used. This flaw arises from an inadequate permission model that fails to restrict file stats through the fs.lstat API. As a result, malicious actors can retrieve stats from files that they do not have explicit read access to. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20 and Node.js 21. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29775 | 1 Redhat | 1 Rhdh | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| xml-crypto is an XML digital signature and encryption library for Node.js. An attacker may be able to exploit a vulnerability in versions prior to 6.0.1, 3.2.1, and 2.1.6 to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms in systems that rely on xml-crypto for verifying signed XML documents. The vulnerability allows an attacker to modify a valid signed XML message in a way that still passes signature verification checks. For example, it could be used to alter critical identity or access control attributes, enabling an attacker to escalate privileges or impersonate another user. Users of versions 6.0.0 and prior should upgrade to version 6.0.1 to receive a fix. Those who are still using v2.x or v3.x should upgrade to patched versions 2.1.6 or 3.2.1, respectively. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45338 | 1 Redhat | 27 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 24 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22262 | 1 Redhat | 1 Apache Camel Spring Boot | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25743 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 3 Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel through 6.9, an untrusted hypervisor can inject virtual interrupts 0 and 14 at any point in time and can trigger the SIGFPE signal handler in userspace applications. This affects AMD SEV-SNP and AMD SEV-ES. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23184 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| Having a large number of address headers (From, To, Cc, Bcc, etc.) becomes excessively CPU intensive. With 100k header lines CPU usage is already 12 seconds, and in a production environment we observed 500k header lines taking 18 minutes to parse. Since this can be triggered by external actors sending emails to a victim, this is a security issue. An external attacker can send specially crafted messages that consume target system resources and cause outage. One can implement restrictions on address headers on MTA component preceding Dovecot. No publicly available exploits are known. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24783 | 1 Redhat | 23 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 20 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| Verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate with an unknown public key algorithm will cause Certificate.Verify to panic. This affects all crypto/tls clients, and servers that set Config.ClientAuth to VerifyClientCertIfGiven or RequireAndVerifyClientCert. The default behavior is for TLS servers to not verify client certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2843 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cluster Observability Operator | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the Observability Operator. The Operator creates a ServiceAccount with *ClusterRole* upon deployment of the *Namespace-Scoped* Custom Resource MonitorStack. This issue allows an adversarial Kubernetes Account with only namespaced-level roles, for example, a tenant controlling a namespace, to create a MonitorStack in the authorized namespace and then elevate permission to the cluster level by impersonating the ServiceAccount created by the Operator, resulting in privilege escalation and other issues. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1233 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Eus, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6717 | 1 Redhat | 15 Amq Broker, Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the SAML client registration in Keycloak that could allow an administrator to register malicious JavaScript URIs as Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URLs (ACS), posing a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risk. This issue may allow a malicious admin in one realm or a client with registration access to target users in different realms or applications, executing arbitrary JavaScript in their contexts upon form submission. This can enable unauthorized access and harmful actions, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the complete KC instance. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30204 | 1 Redhat | 19 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Starting in version 3.2.0 and prior to versions 5.2.2 and 4.5.2, the function parse.ParseUnverified splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. This issue is fixed in 5.2.2 and 4.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12397 | 1 Redhat | 13 Amq Streams, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 10 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Quarkus-HTTP, which incorrectly parses cookies with certain value-delimiting characters in incoming requests. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a cookie value to exfiltrate HttpOnly cookie values or spoof arbitrary additional cookie values, leading to unauthorized data access or modification. The main threat from this flaw impacts data confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37298 | 2 Gorillatoolkit, Redhat | 6 Schema, Advanced Cluster Security, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| gorilla/schema converts structs to and from form values. Prior to version 1.4.1 Running `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct that has a field of type `[]struct{...}` opens it up to malicious attacks regarding memory allocations, taking advantage of the sparse slice functionality. Any use of `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct with arrays of other structs could be vulnerable to this memory exhaustion vulnerability. Version 1.4.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26127 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 8 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 5 more | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3786 | 4 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Node.js, Openssl and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3602 | 5 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 5 Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap, Node.js and 2 more | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). | ||||
| CVE-2020-26147 | 5 Arista, Debian, Linux and 2 more | 15 C-65, C-65 Firmware, C-75 and 12 more | 2026-04-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.8.9. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments even though some of them were sent in plaintext. This vulnerability can be abused to inject packets and/or exfiltrate selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26145 | 3 Redhat, Samsung, Siemens | 27 Enterprise Linux, Galaxy I9305, Galaxy I9305 Firmware and 24 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept second (or subsequent) broadcast fragments even when sent in plaintext and process them as full unfragmented frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26144 | 4 Arista, Redhat, Samsung and 1 more | 37 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 34 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext A-MSDU frames as long as the first 8 bytes correspond to a valid RFC1042 (i.e., LLC/SNAP) header for EAPOL. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26143 | 4 Alfa, Arista, Redhat and 1 more | 13 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-65 and 10 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 1030.36.604 for AWUS036ACH. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept fragmented plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | ||||