Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: cls_api: Don't replay RTM_GETCHAIN in tc_ctl_chain().
If a netlink socket sends RTM_GETCHAIN requests repeatedly
without recv()ing the responses, tc_ctl_chain() hogs CPU and
triggers Hung Task splat. [0]
As caught in the stack trace, netlink_attachskb() could confuse
tc_ctl_chain() by returning -EAGAIN when the userspace netlink
socket's receive buffer is full.
The replay: label exists since commit 32a4f5ecd738 ("net: sched:
introduce chain object to uapi") but was not used initially.
Since commit 9f407f1768d3 ("net: sched: introduce chain templates"),
the label is needed for RTM_NEWCHAIN because tcf_proto_lookup_ops()
may release RTNL to call request_module().
However, the replay logic is unnecessary for RTM_GETCHAIN.
Let's apply the replay logic only for RTM_NEWCHAIN.
[0]:
INFO: task repro:1018 is blocked on a mutex likely owned by task repro:1022.
task:repro state:R running task stack:14096 pid:1022 tgid:1014 ppid:961 task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00080000
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? clockevents_program_event (kernel/time/clockevents.c:372)
? pskb_expand_head (net/core/skbuff.c:615)
? skb_release_data (net/core/skbuff.c:1122)
? netlink_attachskb (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1323 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1332 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232)
? __netlink_lookup (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:711 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:499)
? tc_chain_notify (net/sched/cls_api.c:3045)
? tc_chain_notify (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1384 net/sched/cls_api.c:3041)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335)
? rtnl_unicast (./include/net/netlink.h:1198 net/core/rtnetlink.c:985)
? tc_ctl_chain (net/sched/cls_api.c:3242)
? rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7146)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1354)
? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7177)
? netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319)
? netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900)
? __sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:800)
? __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2281)
? __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2288 net/socket.c:2284 net/socket.c:2284)
? do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84)
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
</TASK>
net/sched: cls_api: Don't replay RTM_GETCHAIN in tc_ctl_chain().
If a netlink socket sends RTM_GETCHAIN requests repeatedly
without recv()ing the responses, tc_ctl_chain() hogs CPU and
triggers Hung Task splat. [0]
As caught in the stack trace, netlink_attachskb() could confuse
tc_ctl_chain() by returning -EAGAIN when the userspace netlink
socket's receive buffer is full.
The replay: label exists since commit 32a4f5ecd738 ("net: sched:
introduce chain object to uapi") but was not used initially.
Since commit 9f407f1768d3 ("net: sched: introduce chain templates"),
the label is needed for RTM_NEWCHAIN because tcf_proto_lookup_ops()
may release RTNL to call request_module().
However, the replay logic is unnecessary for RTM_GETCHAIN.
Let's apply the replay logic only for RTM_NEWCHAIN.
[0]:
INFO: task repro:1018 is blocked on a mutex likely owned by task repro:1022.
task:repro state:R running task stack:14096 pid:1022 tgid:1014 ppid:961 task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00080000
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? clockevents_program_event (kernel/time/clockevents.c:372)
? pskb_expand_head (net/core/skbuff.c:615)
? skb_release_data (net/core/skbuff.c:1122)
? netlink_attachskb (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1323 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1332 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232)
? __netlink_lookup (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:711 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:499)
? tc_chain_notify (net/sched/cls_api.c:3045)
? tc_chain_notify (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1384 net/sched/cls_api.c:3041)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335)
? rtnl_unicast (./include/net/netlink.h:1198 net/core/rtnetlink.c:985)
? tc_ctl_chain (net/sched/cls_api.c:3242)
? rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7146)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1354)
? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7177)
? netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556)
? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319)
? netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900)
? __sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:800)
? __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2281)
? __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2288 net/socket.c:2284 net/socket.c:2284)
? do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84)
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
</TASK>
Published:
2026-09-25
Score:
n/a
EPSS:
n/a
KEV:
No
Analysis and contextual insights are available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Remediation
No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.
Additional remediation guidance may be available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Advisories
No advisories yet.
References
History
Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: cls_api: Don't replay RTM_GETCHAIN in tc_ctl_chain(). If a netlink socket sends RTM_GETCHAIN requests repeatedly without recv()ing the responses, tc_ctl_chain() hogs CPU and triggers Hung Task splat. [0] As caught in the stack trace, netlink_attachskb() could confuse tc_ctl_chain() by returning -EAGAIN when the userspace netlink socket's receive buffer is full. The replay: label exists since commit 32a4f5ecd738 ("net: sched: introduce chain object to uapi") but was not used initially. Since commit 9f407f1768d3 ("net: sched: introduce chain templates"), the label is needed for RTM_NEWCHAIN because tcf_proto_lookup_ops() may release RTNL to call request_module(). However, the replay logic is unnecessary for RTM_GETCHAIN. Let's apply the replay logic only for RTM_NEWCHAIN. [0]: INFO: task repro:1018 is blocked on a mutex likely owned by task repro:1022. task:repro state:R running task stack:14096 pid:1022 tgid:1014 ppid:961 task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> ? clockevents_program_event (kernel/time/clockevents.c:372) ? pskb_expand_head (net/core/skbuff.c:615) ? skb_release_data (net/core/skbuff.c:1122) ? netlink_attachskb (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1323 ./include/linux/skbuff.h:1332 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232) ? __netlink_lookup (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:711 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:499) ? tc_chain_notify (net/sched/cls_api.c:3045) ? tc_chain_notify (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1384 net/sched/cls_api.c:3041) ? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335) ? rtnl_unicast (./include/net/netlink.h:1198 net/core/rtnetlink.c:985) ? tc_ctl_chain (net/sched/cls_api.c:3242) ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7146) ? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1354) ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:7177) ? netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556) ? netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319) ? netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900) ? __sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:800) ? __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2281) ? __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2288 net/socket.c:2284 net/socket.c:2284) ? do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84) ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) </TASK> | |
| Title | net/sched: cls_api: Don't replay RTM_GETCHAIN in tc_ctl_chain(). | |
| First Time appeared |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| CPEs | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | |
| Vendors & Products |
Linux
Linux linux Kernel |
|
| References |
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: Linux
Published:
Updated: 2026-09-25T10:23:03.753Z
Reserved: 2026-09-25T10:18:58.205Z
Link: CVE-2026-97958
No data.
Status : Received
Published: 2026-09-25T11:17:23.477
Modified: 2026-09-25T11:17:23.477
Link: CVE-2026-97958
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
No data.
Weaknesses
No weakness.