Export limit exceeded: 400215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 400215 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (400215 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-90916 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla! | 2026-09-30 | N/A |
| Joomla! Core - [20260906] - Core - Improper ACL checks in content history comparison view in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.8, 6.0.0-6.1.3 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to view inaccessible contents. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86330 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Data Foundation | 2026-09-30 | 7.2 High |
| An OS command injection flaw was found in the set_hostname_internal function of NooBaa's cluster_internal_api. This component is responsible for managing the Multi-Cloud Object Gateway in OpenShift Data Foundation. The vulnerability occurs because the hostname parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper sanitization. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges can provide a specially crafted hostname containing shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary commands on the host system with the privileges of the NooBaa process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79536 | 2026-09-30 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| bytebase dbhub v1.2.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the /utils/sql-parser.ts component. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive databse information via a crafted SQL statement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79535 | 2026-09-30 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| mbailey VoiceMode <= 8.10.1 is vulnerable to OS Command Injection. The update_config MCP tool (and the "voicemode config set" CLI) writes a caller-supplied value into ~/.voicemode/voicemode.env without shell-safe escaping. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79534 | 2026-09-30 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| mark3labs mcp-filesystem-server v0.11.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal due to an improper link resolution in validatePath (filesystemserver/handler/helper.go). When filepath.EvalSymlinks returns os.IsNotExist for a dangling symlink, the fallback validates only the parent directory and returns the unresolved path, so write_file (and modify_file, copy_file, move_file, create_directory) follows a pre-existing dangling symlink located inside an allowed directory and creates a file outside the configured allowed directories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79417 | 2026-09-30 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Improper Access Control in ArgusMonitor.sys in Argotronic eGbR ArgusMonitor 7.4.02 and earlier allows local, low-privileged users to bypass device handle access restrictions via a TOCTOU condition in IRP_MJ_CREATE and send a crafted IOCTL 0x9C4024A8 request, causing denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79403 | 1 Kilo-org | 1 Kilocode | 2026-09-30 | 8.4 High |
| An issue in Kilo Code before v7.4.1 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the permission/allow-everything endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2026-76733 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 4.9 Medium |
| A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Instant On that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service, which resumes without manual intervention. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76731 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the captive portal of HPE Networking Instant On could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain limited access to some data and to make limited changes within the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76730 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of HPE Networking Instant ON APs that could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to circumvent certain existing authentication mechanisms and send unauthorized network traffic to the target device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76729 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 6.6 Medium |
| A format string vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Instant ON APs could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to cause memory corruption with a modified input. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to provoke a denial-of-service condition or remote code execution in the affected system function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76726 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 8.1 High |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Instant ON could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass network access controls if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to obtain unauthorized access to restricted networks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76723 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 9.6 Critical |
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of HPE Networking Instant ON APS that could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76722 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Uncontrolled Format string vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of HPE Networking Instant ON APs that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could result in a Denial-of-service or potential remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76721 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Instant On | 2026-09-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the affected interface of HPE Networking Instant ON that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary code on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54873 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-30 | 7.5 High |
| Issue summary: QUIC process may keep memory for QUIC packet buffer for much longer period than necessary. Impact summary: Remote peer can exploit this vulnerability by sending maliciously crafted packets, making the local QUIC stack to keep the memory for packet buffers allocated. The time for which the memory remains allocated is entirely under the control of the potentially malicious remote peer. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: To save copy operation from the packet buffer to the stream reassemble buffer the QUIC stack leaves the stream data on the packet buffer waiting to be copied to a buffer provided by the local receiving application. The QUIC stack releases a reference to the packet buffer only after the data are copied to the application buffer. This design is more efficient for legitimate data transfers but enables an attacker to allocate a lot more memory than actually required by the data kept in the receiving stream buffer. To mitigate the vulnerability, the QUIC stack now calculates and monitors memory overhead for every stream. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is calculated as a difference between the size of the whole packet that carries the stream frame and the size of the stream frame itself. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is added to the total (cumulative) memory overhead QUIC stack keeps for each stream. Once the cumulative memory overhead exceeds 64kB, the QUIC stack moves the stream frame data from the packet buffer to the stream buffer, starting with the next packet received. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42772 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates progressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has a quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in the buffer for the received stream data. Impact summary: A remote QUIC peer that completes the handshake can create a connection-scoped CPU pressure and potentially a Denial of Service using compliant STREAM frames inside the advertised receive window, with low attacker bandwidth. CWE: CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity Description: OpenSSL manages received QUIC stream fragments using a doubly-linked list. While it optimizes for append operations (at the end of the list), it falls back to a head-to-tail linear search for any fragment that does not immediately follow the current `tail`. By manipulating the sequence of offsets, an attacker can force the server to perform O(n^2) operations, consuming excessive CPU time for the QUIC process. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35191 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-30 | 3.7 Low |
| Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received. Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack. CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed. The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC. FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35189 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points causes disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches X.509 extensions. Impact summary: Receiving a crafted certificate from a malicious peer can lead to significant memory pressure and possible Denial of Service in clients or in servers that solicit client certificates. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: A certificate or a set of certificates that fits under the limit for size of certificates accepted from the peer (~100 KiB) can result in allocation of several hundred MiB of resident memory on the receiving side during a normal TLS handshake. This may be enough to crash the client or server, if multiple concurrent connections lead to similarly large memory allocations. The fix postpones processing of the CRL distribution points extensions in certificates to the time when the processed value is required for CRL processing. This avoids keeping large memory allocations for a long time when such certificates are received. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19445 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-09-30 | N/A |
| A remote, unauthenticated TLS client can make a server crash or call through a freed pointer if its sni_callback assigns a different context to SSLSocket.context (the documented way to select a certificate per server name) and nothing else keeps the original ssl.SSLContext alive. Typical cases are servers that create an SSLContext per connection or replace it while connections are open; servers that wrap their listening socket with it are not affected. Mitigation: keep a reference to every SSLContext that sets sni_callback for the lifetime of the server. TLS clients are not affected. | ||||