Export limit exceeded: 395682 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10034 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10034 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87031 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| n Concrete CMS 9.2.0 through 9.5.3, the REST API user creation endpoint (POST /ccm/api/1.0/users, the add() method of concrete/src/Api/Controller/Users.php) did not perform a permission check before creating an account. As a result, any valid OAuth token carrying the users:add scope, including a client_credentials token with no associated user context, could create active, validated user accounts, bypassing email verification and administrator approval. Under default registration settings the created accounts could then edit page content, providing a path to stored cross-site scripting and further compromise. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18120 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Concrete CMS before 9.5.3 exposed a legacy Express entry search endpoint that returned entry result JSON without invoking the canViewExpressEntries() permission check applied by the normal dashboard and CSV Export flow. An unauthenticated visitor who knew or discovered an Express entity identifier could enumerate that entity's entry search results, disclosing attribute values intended to be restricted to privileged users. For Express entities that do not support entry-specific permissions (i.e., supportsEntrySpecificPermissions() returns false), per-entry permission filtering is additionally disabled via EntryList::ignorePermissions(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Daniel Powell for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82561 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Apache NiFi 1.5.0 through 2.11.0 provide REST API methods that replace the entire contents of a Process Group using a client-supplied flow definition, covering Process Group flow replacement together with versioned flow update and rebase operations. Framework authorization for these methods was limited to read and write privileges on the Process Group itself, unlike the corresponding asynchronous update request methods, which also authorize the components encapsulated in the Process Group along with referenced Controller Services, Parameter Contexts, and Parameter Providers. As a result of the missing authorization, an authenticated user with write access to a Process Group could supply a flow definition that modifies or removes components in descendant Process Groups protected by more restrictive access policies, and could bind components to Controller Services and Parameter Contexts without authorization for those referenced components. Existing verification checks limited the impact to stopped components, and the issue applies only to deployments that use component-level authorization policies, because the framework enforces write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which applies consistent reference resolution and component authorization across Process Group replacement and versioned flow update methods | ||||
| CVE-2026-86089 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Apache NiFi 2.11.0 supports migrating the contents of a version-controlled Process Group into a Connector using REST API methods that list eligible migration sources and submit migration requests. The framework authorized both methods against the target Connector alone, without evaluating access to the Process Groups involved. The absence of Process Group authorization allowed an authenticated user with read access to a Connector to enumerate the identifiers, names, and flow registry details of version-controlled Process Groups outside the scope of granted read policies. It also allowed a user with write access to a Connector to migrate a Process Group without write access to that Process Group, copying the flow definition, referenced assets, and component state into the Connector, and leaving the source Process Group disabled and renamed. Migration excludes sensitive property values and requires the source Process Group to be stopped with empty queues, which limits the scope of exposure. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement component-level authorization policies for Process Groups are not subject to this vulnerability, because the framework enforces Connector write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which filters migration sources to Process Groups the requesting user is authorized to read, and requires write access to the source Process Group when submitting a migration request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87026 | 1 Tanium | 1 Threat Response | 2026-09-18 | 3.8 Low |
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Threat Response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81866 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Apache NiFi 2.9.0 through 2.11.0 provide Connector configuration update and verification REST API methods that do not enforce authorization checking on Assets and Secrets referenced in proposed configuration. Updating or verifying a Connector configuration step can apply Asset and Secret references, but framework authorization was limited to write privileges on the Connector itself. As a result of the missing authorization, an authenticated user authorized to modify a Connector, but not authorized to read a referenced Parameter Provider, could apply Secret values backed by that Parameter Provider. The same methods also accepted Asset identifiers without verifying that the Asset belonged to the Connector being configured. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different levels of authorization across Connectors and Parameter Providers are not subject to this vulnerability, because the framework enforces write permissions on the Connector as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which authorizes read access to referenced Parameter Providers and verifies Connector ownership of referenced Assets during configuration update and verification. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92763 | 1 Rundeck | 1 Rundeck | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| Rundeck through 6.2.1 fails to properly authorize the importConfig and importNodesSources parameters in the project archive import endpoint. Attackers with only the import action can replace project configuration files including security-relevant settings like node executors and SSH key paths that affect job execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61592 | 1 Djust-org | 1 Djust | 2026-09-18 | 7.4 High |
| djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, SSE sessions were keyed solely by a client-chosen `session_id` with no binding to the authenticated user — a control the WebSocket transport has but that was dropped on SSE. An attacker who learns (or a victim who leaks) a `session_id` could connect to the message endpoint and dispatch event handlers that execute with the victim's identity and state. This is fixed in djust 1.0.7. Each SSE session is bound to its owning principal at creation and cross-principal access is rejected; SSE session creation is additionally capped per principal. As a workaround, disable the SSE transport. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79116 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in Viz in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79067 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-88619 | 1 1024-lab | 1 Smartadmin | 2026-09-17 | 8.1 High |
| 1024-lab SmartAdmin v3.30.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the scheduled-job management module. The AdminSmartJobController exposes scheduled-job management endpoints without method-level permission checks, allowing a low-privileged authenticated user to access functionality intended for authorized administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16582 | 2026-09-17 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.5. This is due to the plugin accepting a client-supplied package-redemption identifier as proof of payment without validating it. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create approved appointment bookings without completing payment | ||||
| CVE-2026-66676 | 2 Matrixaddons, Wordpress | 2 Easy Invoice, Wordpress | 2026-09-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Easy Invoice <= 2.3.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92803 | 1 Libretranslate | 1 Libretranslate | 2026-09-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| LibreTranslate through 1.9.6 omits the access_check decorator from the download_file route, allowing unauthenticated access to translated files. Attackers can bypass API key requirements and abuse ban lists to download files without authentication on protected instances. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92455 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the sendSms and sendMail endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to send SMS and email to arbitrary customers. Attackers can invoke POST /admin-api/crm/customer/send-sms and POST /admin-api/crm/customer/send-mail with arbitrary customerIds, templateCode, and templateParams to deliver unauthorized messages through the organization's SMS and email channels. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92456 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 7.1 High |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the saveRedisSet and getRedisSet endpoints in CrmCustomerController, allowing any authenticated back-office user to read and modify installation-wide lead-allocation and customer auto-recycling policy. Attackers can invoke these endpoints to manipulate shared Redis keys controlling customer auto-recycling behavior, causing mass customer data deletion, disabling lead recycling, or blocking customer creation across the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92457 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the CrmInvoiceController issueInvoice endpoint that allows authenticated back-office users to issue arbitrary invoices. Attackers can call the PUT /admin-api/crm/invoice/issue endpoint without required permissions to modify invoice status, inflate contract invoiced amounts with attacker-chosen values, and trigger invoice emails to arbitrary addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92459 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the CrmCluesController receiveCustomer endpoint that allows authenticated back-office users to claim sales leads without proper permission checks. Attackers can invoke the lead-claim endpoint to reassign leads from other employees to themselves by overwriting the ownerUserId field, with no access logging or quota validation to prevent bulk lead theft. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92460 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 fails to enforce authorization on the GET /admin-api/crm/operatelog/page endpoint, allowing any authenticated back-office user to access the installation-wide audit trail. Attackers can query the operation log to retrieve operator names, display nicknames, client IP addresses, User-Agent strings, request URLs, action details, and customer identifiers without proper permission checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92461 | 1 Guchengwuyue | 1 Yshop-crm | 2026-09-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| yshop-crm through 2.1.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the GET /admin-api/crm/flow/flow-users endpoint that allows any logged-in back-office user to access approval workflow data. Attackers can retrieve approval chain topology, step ordering, approver identifiers, and personal information including login names, nicknames, departments, email addresses, mobile numbers and last login IP addresses. | ||||