Export limit exceeded: 404440 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404440 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404440 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (404440 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-84245 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component. A low-privileged local user could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84198 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84057 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62128 | 2 Creator Lms, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Creator Lms, Creator Lms | 2026-10-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Creator LMS Creator LMS creatorlms allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Creator LMS: from n/a through 1.2.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16178 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16165 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a null pointer dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14905 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to an XML external entity injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14521 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13257 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow an authenticated user to forge signature requests due to improper verification of data authenticity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107639 | 1 Ilias | 1 Ilias | 2026-10-10 | 8.8 High |
| ILIAS before 9.24, 10.x before 10.12 and 11.x before 11.5 contains an argument injection vulnerability in assImagemapQuestionGUI that allows question authors to inject ImageMagick convert options via uploaded image filenames. Attackers can embed tab-separated options, which escapeshellcmd() does not neutralise, to write a PHP file under the web root and achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107634 | 1 Aorimn | 1 Dislocker | 2026-10-10 | 6.1 Medium |
| Dislocker through 0.7.3 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in get_dataset() and get_next_datum() that never validate dataset and datum sizes against the metadata allocation. Attackers can craft a BitLocker volume image with inflated dataset or datum sizes that, when opened or mounted, crashes dislocker or discloses adjacent heap memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105829 | 1 Thephpleague | 1 Commonmark | 2026-10-10 | 6.1 Medium |
| League CommonMark from 1.3.0 before 2.10.2 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows users posting Markdown to bypass the DisallowedRawHtml extension by ending raw HTML with a bare disallowed tag name. Attackers can place a lone <script or <iframe line followed by a block supplying attributes like src or onload, executing stored scripts in viewers' browsers under default GFM settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88647 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gnutls | 2026-10-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| A hostname verification bypass in GnuTLS v3.8.13 allows attackers to circumvent the Common Name fallback mechanism and eavesdrop on communications via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76284 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization. Splunk addressed multiple internally identified vulnerabilities in Splunk Enterprise versions 10.4.3, 10.2.7, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15. The vulnerabilities are grouped by Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE), with one Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier assigned to each group. See Details for more information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76279 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user that holds a role with the run_collect capability could use the collect Search Processing Language (SPL) command to write events to internal indexes outside the index access configured for the role. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Enterprise does not normalize whitespace in an index name before applying configured index-access restrictions for the role. For more information see collect (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl-search-reference/10.4/search-commands/collect), Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.4/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities), and How indexing works (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-indexers-and-indexer-clusters/10.4/indexing-overview/how-indexing-works) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76274 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, and 10.0.10, a user that holds a role with the read_o11y_content capability could redirect an outbound request from Splunk App for Splunk Observability Cloud through the Representational State Transfer (REST) API to an attacker-controlled host and disclose the configured Observability Cloud Application Programming Interface (API) token. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk App for Splunk Observability Cloud does not fully validate the destination of an outbound request. For more information see Authentication tokens (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-observability-cloud/administer/authentication-and-security/authentication-tokens) in the Splunk documentation. Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4.x are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76269 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.3, 10.2.7, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use a user-controlled job identifier to access substantially all search job information from jobs that belong to other users, including search query text, job metadata, results, and preview results, through an Application Programming Interface (API) implemented as a Representational State Transfer (REST) API. The vulnerability is possible because the REST API does not fully validate job ownership before returning search job information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76264 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.10, and 9.4.15, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could create or edit scripted lookup definitions through raw configuration endpoints. The vulnerability is possible because raw transforms configuration write paths do not apply external lookup capability checks before saving scripted lookup settings. | ||||