Export limit exceeded: 20806 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 14031 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (14031 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-85395 | 1 Webkul | 1 Unopim | 2026-09-05 | 7.1 High |
| UnoPim before 2.1.3 fails to include integration store, update, and key-generation routes in its ACL map, allowing any admin user to bypass permission checks. Attackers with minimal admin privileges can create OAuth API integrations, mint client credentials, and escalate permissions by exploiting missing authorization validation in the Bouncer middleware. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85309 | 2 Supsystic, Wordpress | 2 Ultimate Maps By Supsystic, Wordpress | 2026-09-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Supsystic Ultimate Maps by Supsystic allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Ultimate Maps by Supsystic: from n/a through 1.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85210 | 1 Oppia | 1 Oppia | 2026-09-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| Oppia's AdminRoleHandler GET endpoint in core/controllers/admin.py is decorated with open_access, allowing any registered user to enumerate privileged accounts and roles. Attackers can query the endpoint with filter_criterion parameters to retrieve usernames holding specific roles, banned flags, and managed topic identifiers without authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84847 | 2 Brightvesseldev, Wordpress | 2 Quick Event Manager, Wordpress | 2026-09-05 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Quick Event Manager <= 9.17 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82023 | 2 Thimpress, Wordpress | 2 Learnpress, Wordpress | 2026-09-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| LearnPress WordPress Plugin before 4.4.6 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with the Instructor role to add answers to quiz questions owned by other instructors by exploiting a missing ownership check on the question answer insert path. Attackers can supply arbitrary question identifiers during answer insertion, bypassing instructor-boundary restrictions to persistently modify quiz content across courses they do not own. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55658 | 1 1hive | 1 Gardens-v2 | 2026-09-05 | 7.7 High |
| Gardens v2 is a modular governance framework that enables communities to create and manage multiple governance pools with customizable parameters and voting mechanisms. In 3e595f3 and prior, when a streaming proposal is funded, the cluster of streaming contracts moves real pool funds into the proposal's StreamingEscrow to back the Superfluid constant flow agreement (the CFA deposit, plus a 0.5 percent margin). cancelProposal then zeroes the escrow's GDA member units but never reclaims that parked balance, and the permissionless claim() forwards the escrow's entire balance, including the pool funded buffer, to the beneficiary. The beneficiary is chosen by the proposal submitter and defaults to the submitter. The only path that returns escrow funds to the pool is drainToStrategy, which is onlyStrategy and is reached solely from the dispute reject ruling, never from cancel or natural completion. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85390 | 2 Bluewave-labs, Bluewavelabs | 2 Checkmate, Checkmate | 2026-09-05 | 7.1 High |
| Checkmate through 3.11.0 omits the isAllowed role guard middleware on maintenance-window, notification, and check-deletion routes, allowing read-only users to perform administrative actions. Attackers with user-role sessions can create arbitrary maintenance windows to silence alerts, modify notification channels, and delete monitor check history to erase incident evidence. | ||||
| CVE-2026-74769 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Manager | 2026-09-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, versions 20.2.0.0 and below, contain an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in the REST API. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47841 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring Security, Spring Security | 2026-09-04 | 7.4 High |
| An application using Spring Security's WebAuthn support may be vulnerable to user verification bypass when using a distributed HTTP session store. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 | ||||
| CVE-2026-78970 | 1 Jeecgboot | 1 Jeecgboot | 2026-09-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| JeecgBoot 3.9.2 and earlier contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the SystemApiController component. An authenticated attacker with any valid JWT token can access multiple API endpoints (including queryAllUser, queryUsersByUsernames, queryUserById, and queryUsersByIds) to retrieve sensitive information of all users, including real names, phone numbers, email addresses, employee numbers, and role definitions, due to missing fine-grained permission checks and incomplete data desensitization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72672 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-04 | 7.7 High |
| The Elastic Security capability that suggests existing field values while a user authors endpoint policy artifacts queries Elastic Defend event data with Kibana's internal Elasticsearch account instead of the account of the requesting user. Only Kibana feature privileges are verified, and the caller's Elasticsearch index privileges are not. An authenticated user who holds Elastic Security feature privileges but no read access to the Elastic Defend event indices can therefore retrieve field values from that data, including process command line arguments, which commonly contain tokens, credentials, connection strings, and other sensitive operational detail from protected hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72671 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A Kibana Machine Learning capability that removes a saved object from the current space accepts machine learning trained models as a target, but it verifies only the privileges that apply to anomaly detection jobs and data frame analytics jobs. A user whose role grants create anomaly detection jobs and data frame analytics jobs without the trained model privilege can therefore remove a trained model from a space. The model itself is not deleted and remains available in its other spaces, and the change can be reversed by a suitably privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72669 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-04 | 7.6 High |
| The state that Kibana stores for an Observability Onboarding flow is not bound to the user who created the flow, and the routes that read and update that state do not verify ownership. An authenticated user who holds only generic read access to the space can therefore discover the onboarding flows of other users, read their onboarding state, and write arbitrary progress data into them. A tampered flow can also cause the owner's onboarding view to fail with a server error. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85538 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2026-09-04 | N/A |
| An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed authenticated users to delete attributes from events despite lacking the required perm_modify or perm_modify_org permissions. The affected attribute deletion paths relied on organization membership checks performed by MispAttribute::deleteAttribute() but did not consistently enforce MISP's event modification authorization rules. Consequently, a user belonging to the organization associated with an event could potentially delete individual attributes or perform bulk attribute deletion even when their assigned role was not authorized to modify the event. This created an inconsistency between attribute editing and deletion: editing an attribute correctly used MISP's ACL::canModifyEvent() authorization logic, whereas the affected deletion operations could bypass these permission checks. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected MISP instance and membership in the organization owning an event could exploit this flaw to remove attributes from that event, potentially causing unauthorized modification or loss of threat intelligence data. The patch introduces a common authorization check for all affected deletion paths. Before deletion, MISP now resolves the associated events and verifies that the current user is authorized to modify each event using the same authorization mechanism used by normal event and attribute modification operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85533 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2026-09-04 | N/A |
| An authorization flaw in MISP allowed an authenticated user to submit a sharing_group_id without verifying that the user was authorized to use the referenced Sharing Group. In several attribute and Galaxy Cluster creation and editing workflows, validation of the submitted Sharing Group was performed only when the request explicitly set the distribution field to 4 ("Sharing Group"). An attacker could therefore craft a request containing a sharing_group_id while omitting the distribution parameter, or otherwise avoiding the distribution == 4 condition, causing the Sharing Group authorization check to be skipped. This could allow a user with permission to create or modify the affected MISP objects to associate data with a Sharing Group that they are not authorized to use. Depending on the affected object's existing distribution settings and subsequent processing, this could bypass intended information-sharing boundaries and result in unauthorized placement or distribution of data to members of another Sharing Group. The issue affected attribute attachment and editing operations as well as Galaxy Cluster creation and editing. The fix ensures that authorization is performed whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is submitted, independently of the distribution parameter. It also centralizes the authorization decision in SharingGroup::canUse() and explicitly rejects empty Sharing Group identifiers rather than allowing them to be interpreted as an unrestricted query. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76111 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-04 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to invoke administrator-only operations, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58566 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-04 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore, an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72633 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Entity Analytics can lead to a loss of security monitoring via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user holding only read-level Security feature access, and no Elasticsearch privileges, could stop the recurring Privilege Monitoring engine task for a Kibana space. Privileged user monitoring then stops producing data for that space while the engine continues to report a healthy state to operators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73603 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-09-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Flowise before 3.1.4 fails to validate chatflow visibility in the unauthenticated text-to-speech endpoint, allowing attackers to abuse private chatflow TTS credentials. Unauthenticated attackers can generate unlimited text-to-speech audio using stored OpenAI or ElevenLabs API keys by providing a valid chatflow UUID, incurring costs on the chatflow owner's account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84470 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-04 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller (AWX). The Bulk Job Launch API (POST /api/v2/bulk/job_launch/) authorizes the requested instance_groups with only a read-level permission check, whereas the standard single-job launch path requires use-level permission on the same field. A principal that holds read (but not use) permission on an instance group -- for example the built-in read-only System Auditor role -- together with execute permission on a job template can launch bulk jobs onto instance groups they are not authorized to use, bypassing execution-placement isolation. | ||||