Export limit exceeded: 398634 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (398634 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-100666 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 7.3 High |
| Netty's HttpServerCodec (io.netty:netty-codec-http) in versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.16.Final and in versions up to and including 4.1.136.Final pairs each outbound response with an inbound request by calling pollMethod() once per response, including for 1xx informational responses. If a client pipelines an HTTP/1.1 GET carrying an Expect: 100-continue header followed by a HEAD request, the 100 Continue response consumes the queued GET method, so the subsequent 200 OK for the GET is paired with HEAD and its body is dropped, while the following 200 OK for the HEAD request is written with a body. This desynchronizes HTTP parsing on the connection: the GET entity is never delivered and the HEAD response body is interpreted as the GET body, resulting in response splitting and unsafe connection reuse. Fixed in 4.2.17.Final and 4.1.137.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100664 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 7.5 High |
| Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final builds the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header from the HTTP/1 Host header before considering the authority of an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target. In HttpConversionUtil.toHttp3Headers(HttpMessage, boolean) — reached via Http3FrameToHttpObjectCodec(false) — a non-empty Host header takes precedence over the request-target authority, contrary to the HTTP/1.1 rule that a server receiving an absolute-form request-target must ignore the Host header. In a Netty-based HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateway, proxy, or protocol bridge, a remote client can send a request such as "GET https://trusted.example/admin HTTP/1.1" with "Host: attacker.example", causing components that validate, authorize, or route on the RFC-defined request-target authority to reach a different decision than the upstream HTTP/3 peer, which receives :authority derived from the conflicting Host header. This authority confusion can affect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache keys, and URL generation. The advisory reports integrity impact only (no code execution, memory corruption, or availability impact). Fixed in 4.2.18.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100659 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) in versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.17.Final does not enforce the RFC 9114 requirement that the :authority pseudo-header field and a literal host header field, when both present, carry the same value. A remote unauthenticated peer can send a single HEADERS frame containing both fields with differing, attacker-controlled values; the request is accepted and delivered to the application with two conflicting authorities, allowing routing, virtual-host, and access-control decisions to be bypassed when different components in the request path consult different fields. This issue is fixed in 4.2.18.Final. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88773 | 2026-09-27 | N/A | ||
| Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1-37.279 and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 FIPS and before 13.1-64.23. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67633 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69686 | 1 Microsoft | 18 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 15 more | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101041 | 2026-09-27 | N/A | ||
| The account recovery (password reset) functionality in the vulnerability-lookup web application contains a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the consumption of single-use recovery tokens. The original implementation verified the token nonce against the stored digest and then consumed (cleared) it in separate database operations. Two concurrent HTTP requests presenting the same valid recovery token could both pass the verification check before either transaction committed, allowing both to set their own password on the target account. The last transaction to commit overwrites the first, enabling an attacker who possesses a valid recovery token to replace the legitimate user's password with one of their choosing. A secondary defect in the same endpoint (confirm_account) allowed a valid recovery link to be used to set an empty or trivially short password (e.g., three characters). The view handler performed only a manual equality comparison between the two password fields and never invoked the form's validation logic, bypassing the intended minimum-length and complexity constraints. The affected component is the user account recovery endpoint (/user/confirm_account/<token>) and the associated token verification and consumption logic in the User model (website/models/user.py) and the view layer (website/web/views/user.py). | ||||
| CVE-2026-69355 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019, Exchange Server Se and 1 more | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| External control of file name or path in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80078 | 1 Microsoft | 15 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 12 more | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101033 | 2026-09-27 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| KitchenOwl through 0.7.10 fails to verify that category IDs belong to the caller's household in expense and item operations. Authenticated attackers can enumerate category IDs from other households to read their category names, budgets, and colors, breaking household isolation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101032 | 2026-09-27 | 7 High | ||
| navi through 2.24.0 fails to properly escape cheatsheet variable values when substituting them into shell commands. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through crafted file names in suggestion command directories to execute arbitrary commands with victim privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100872 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 7.5 High |
| Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to validate payment amounts during cart recalculation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify order totals after gateway transaction initiation. Attackers can pay a small amount, enlarge the order after gateway capture, and have the system mark the inflated order as fully paid while the gateway captured only the original amount. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100871 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 fail to include firewall identification in JWT tokens issued by separate Admin and Shop API endpoints. Attackers can register a shop customer account using an administrator's email address and obtain a token that the Admin API resolves to that administrator, granting full administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100870 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 build administrator password-reset links using the request Host header without validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect reset tokens to attacker-controlled domains. Attackers can request password resets for known administrator email addresses with forged Host headers to intercept valid reset tokens and take over administrator accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100869 | 1 Sylius | 1 Sylius | 2026-09-27 | 5.9 Medium |
| Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to restrict payment request actions in the Shop API endpoint, allowing customers to trigger refunds on completed orders. Attackers with order tokens can submit arbitrary payment actions like refunds that payment gateways execute while Sylius maintains order as paid, causing financial loss. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100868 | 1 Kaleidos | 1 Penpot | 2026-09-27 | 6.3 Medium |
| Penpot before 2.18.0 binds the MCP server plugin WebSocket bridge to all network interfaces without authentication in single-user mode. Unauthenticated attackers on adjacent networks can connect to the WebSocket port to impersonate the Penpot browser plugin, intercept task payloads, and return forged results to the MCP client. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100867 | 2026-09-27 | 3.3 Low | ||
| spaceship-prompt through 4.22.5 fails to sanitize control characters from project manifest version fields before rendering them in the zsh prompt. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in version fields of package manifests to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, or spoof displayed text when victims enter the directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100866 | 2026-09-27 | 3.3 Low | ||
| onefetch through 2.28.1 writes repository information field values to the terminal without removing control characters, allowing terminal escape sequence injection. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in project manifest version and name fields to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, hide text, or trigger emulator-specific behavior when victims run onefetch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15442 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-09-27 | N/A |
| In all builds that make use of (D)TLS, including default builds, there is a series of conditional states during the TLS shutdown which could lead to a heap-use-after free. If an application ended up getting a partial wolfSSL_read() which is sometimes caused by a small user buffer passed in, then called wolfSSL_shutdown for a bidirectional close and attempted to wolfSSL_read() again while the peer continues trying to send data during the shutdown it would lead to a state where a potential heap-use-after free happened. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100748 | 2026-09-27 | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in various cart actions in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 | ||||