Export limit exceeded: 10818 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10818 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39639 | 1 Iptanus | 1 Wordpress File Upload | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in Nickolas Bossinas WordPress File Upload allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WordPress File Upload: from n/a through 4.24.7. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5622 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management console (openshift-console/app/controllers/application_controller.rb) in OpenShift 0.0.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3294 | 1 Ibm | 2 Websphere Mq, Websphere Mq Managed File Transfer | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Web Gateway component in IBM WebSphere MQ File Transfer Edition 7.0.4 and earlier, and WebSphere MQ - Managed File Transfer 7.5, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) add user accounts via the /wmqfteconsole/Filespaces URI, (2) modify permissions via the /wmqfteconsole/FileSpacePermisssions URI, or (3) add MQ Message Descriptor (MQMD) user accounts via the /wmqfteconsole/UploadUsers URI. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3029 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Administrative console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.47, 7.0 before 7.0.0.31, 8.0 before 8.0.0.7, and 8.5 before 8.5.5.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2980 | 1 Ibm | 1 Data Studio | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Console in IBM Data Studio 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that access monitored database information. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3095 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dir865l, Dir865l Firmware | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR865L router (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.05b07 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrator password or (2) enable remote management via a request to hedwig.cgi or (3) activate configuration changes via a request to pigwidgeon.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3098 | 1 Trendnet | 2 Tew-812dru, Tew-812dru Firmware | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in TRENDnet TEW-812DRU router with firmware before 1.0.9.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change admin credentials in a request to setSysAdm.cgi, (2) enable remote management or (3) enable port forwarding in an Apply action to uapply.cgi, or (4) have unspecified impact via a request to setNTP.cgi. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2305 | 1 Cybozu | 3 Cybozu Dezie, Cybozu Office, Mailwise | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0, Cybozu Dezie before 8.0.7, and Cybozu Mailwise before 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3963 | 1 Grandstream | 11 Gxv3500, Gxv3501, Gxv3504 and 8 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/usermanage in Grandstream GXV3501, GXV3504, GXV3601, GXV3601HD/LL, GXV3611HD/LL, GXV3615W/P, GXV3651FHD, GXV3662HD, GXV3615WP_HD, GXV3500, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that add users. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3992 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Biginsights | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 2.0 through 2.1 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4000 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Command Center | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in IBM Cognos Command Center before 10.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) start or (2) stop services. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4555 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/action/logout.php in SPIP before 2.1.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that logout the user via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2158 | 2 Drupal, Services Project | 2 Drupal, Services | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Services module 6.x-3.x and 7.x-3.x before 7.x-3.4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4671 | 1 Symantec | 3 Web Gateway, Web Gateway Appliance 8450, Web Gateway Appliance 8490 | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management console on the Symantec Web Gateway (SWG) appliance before 5.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4689 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| J-Web in Juniper Junos before 10.4R13, 11.4 before 11.4R7, 12.1R before 12.1R6, 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D15, 12.1x45 before 12.1X45-D10, 12.2 before 12.2R3, 12.3 before 12.3R2, and 13.1 before 13.1R3 allow remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism and hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create new administrator accounts or (2) have other unspecified impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1468 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the LocalFiles Editor plugin in Piwigo before 2.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create arbitrary PHP files via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5672 | 2 Indianic, Wordpress | 2 Testimonial Plugin, Wordpress | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5696 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5708 | 1 Trivantis | 1 Coursemill Learning Management System | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.8 constructs secret tokens based on time values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via vectors related to cookies, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3605. | ||||
| CVE-2013-5726 | 1 Tapbots | 1 Tweetbot | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Tweetbot 1.3.3 for Mac, and 2.8.5 for iPad and iPhone, does not require confirmation of (1) follow or (2) favorite actions, which allows remote attackers to automatically force the user to perform undesired actions, as demonstrated via the tweetbot:///follow/ URL. | ||||