Export limit exceeded: 396026 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 396026 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (396026 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-71182 | 1 Dell | 1 Update Package Framework | 2026-09-21 | 3 Low |
| Dell Update Package Framework, versions prior to 26.07.03, contains an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-36471 | 2026-09-21 | N/A | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data of the __post_data parameter in cn_parse_url() in CuteNews v.2.1.2 allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary values into internal request variables (including __referer) via a crafted base64-encoded serialized PHP payload submitted as a POST parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61681 | 1 Hatchet-dev | 1 Hatchet | 2026-09-21 | 4.1 Medium |
| Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.91.1, the SNS UnsubscribeConfirmation handler in internal/integrations/ingestors/sns/sns.go calls http.Get() on payload.UnsubscribeURL after VerifyPayload() even though BuildSignature() excludes UnsubscribeURL, allowing an authenticated Hatchet tenant to replace that field in an otherwise valid AWS-signed message with an internal URL. The server-side request can reach EC2 Instance Metadata Service, internal services, and internal HTTP APIs, potentially exposing IAM credentials or network-accessible data and functionality. This issue is fixed in version 0.91.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55563 | 1 Feast-dev | 1 Feast | 2026-09-21 | N/A |
| Feast is the open source feature store for AI and machine learning. Prior to 0.65.0, .github/workflows/pr_integration_tests.yml uses pull_request_target with the synchronize event and preserves ok-to-test, approved, or lgtm labels across newly pushed commits, allowing a fork contributor to obtain approval for a benign revision and then run changed code from refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge through privileged make targets. The job exposes GCP, AWS, and Snowflake credentials to that code, enabling runner code execution, credential disclosure, and possible access to downstream cloud resources. An external label-removal integration could mitigate the condition, but no repository workflow provided that protection. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58504 | 1 Jgraph | 1 Drawio | 2026-09-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.2.5, opening or importing a crafted .drawio file can execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the draw.io origin when selected cells are processed by TextFormatPanel.addFont() in src/main/webapp/js/grapheditor/Format.js. An HTML sibling cell keeps the formatted-label path enabled while an editable=0 plain-text sibling is excluded from the merged selection style but remains in the iteration set. graph.cellRenderer.getLabelValue() returns that plain-text label without HTML encoding, and mxUtils.canConvertHtmlToSvg() parses it as HTML, bypassing the earlier CVE-2026-46642 remediation. Successful exploitation can expose diagram data, browser storage, non-HttpOnly cookies, and same-origin actions available to the victim. This issue is fixed in version 30.2.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63373 | 1 Jgraph | 1 Drawio | 2026-09-21 | 4.2 Medium |
| draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.2.7, the OAuth callback handler in src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/AbsAuth.java skips comparison of stateToken and cookieToken whenever IS_GAE is false, which affects self-hosted Docker and WAR deployments. An attacker can provide an authorization code for the attacker's cloud-storage identity and induce a victim to visit a callback URL, causing the victim's draw.io session to become authenticated as the attacker identity without a valid state binding. The shared handler affects Google Drive, OneDrive, GitHub, GitLab, and Dropbox integrations. The victim can then unknowingly perform cloud-storage actions under the attacker's identity, causing session integrity loss and misattribution, but the identity binding does not itself grant access to existing victim cloud files. This issue is fixed in version 30.2.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76898 | 1 Jgraph | 1 Drawio | 2026-09-21 | N/A |
| draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.3.8, src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/Utils.java checks IPv6 Unique Local Addresses in Utils.sanitizeUrl() by comparing the text prefixes fc00:: and fd00::, but the JDK returns the expanded address form, so the fc00::/7 range, including the AWS metadata range fd00:ec2::/32, is not blocked. An unauthenticated request to /embed2.js?fetch= can therefore make src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/EmbedServlet2.java fetch an IPv6 ULA internal resource and reflect the response to the requester. Utils.validatedAddress() uses the same private-address check for the separate ProxyServlet path, which requires ENABLE_DRAWIO_PROXY=1. The primary /embed2.js path requires no proxy feature flag or DNS rebinding, and it can disclose cloud metadata credentials or data from other IPv6-reachable internal services. This issue is fixed in version 30.3.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63342 | 1 Hatchet-dev | 1 Hatchet | 2026-09-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| Hatchet is a platform for orchestrating background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows at scale. Prior to 0.91.1, api-contracts/openapi/paths/v1/workflow-runs/workflow_run.yaml defines the GET /api/v1/stable/durable-tasks/{durable-task} endpoint implemented by listDurableEventLog without requiring the target tenant as a parent resource, allowing an authenticated user who obtains another tenant's durable task UUID to read that task's event log. Disclosed data can include task display names, workflow identifiers, user messages, wait conditions, branching logic, and timing information. This issue is fixed in version 0.91.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92125 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-21 | 8.8 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not reject the @GroovyASTTransformationClass annotation, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to run an arbitrary AST transformation at compile time, bypassing the sandbox protection and executing arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91097 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91098 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91099 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91100 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91101 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91102 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91103 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91104 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91105 | 2 Hp, Hp Inc. | 2 Linux Imaging And Printing, Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6862 | 2 Redhat, Ubuntu | 5 Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird, Openshift and 2 more | 2026-09-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libefiboot, a component of efivar. The device path node parser in libefiboot fails to validate that each node's Length field is at least 4 bytes, which is the minimum size for an EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) device path node header. A local user could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted device path node. This can lead to infinite recursion, causing stack exhaustion and a process crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-86864 | 1 Pgadmin | 1 Pgadmin 4 | 2026-09-21 | 8.8 High |
| pgAdmin 4's Backup tool appended the client-supplied 'database' field from the /backup/job/<sid>/object request to the pg_dump argument vector as a bare trailing positional argument, without validation. Because pg_dump parses its options with getopt_long, which permutes arguments, a value beginning with a dash was interpreted as an option rather than as a database name. A value such as --file=/absolute/path therefore overrode the storage-confined --file that pgAdmin had constructed earlier, causing pg_dump to write its output anywhere the pgAdmin process could write, outside the user's File Manager storage directory. This yields arbitrary file creation and overwrite as the operating-system account running pgAdmin, which can destroy pgAdmin's own configuration database and, depending on the target chosen, be escalated further. The same field additionally permitted connection-string injection. libpq expands a database name containing an equals sign into a full connection string, and keywords embedded there override the --host and --port that pgAdmin passes, so a value such as 'host=attacker.example port=5432 dbname=x' redirected pg_dump to a server of the attacker's choosing. Because pgAdmin exports the decrypted stored database password in the PGPASSWORD environment variable before executing the utility, the redirected connection carries that credential to the attacker-nominated endpoint. Both behaviours are reachable by any authenticated user holding the tools_backup permission, which is granted to the default User role. The fix stops passing the database name through the argument vector altogether and supplies it in the PGDATABASE environment variable, which libpq treats as a literal database name and never expands as a connection string. This matches the approach already used by the Import/Export tool. Regression tests assert that the database name is absent from the constructed argument vector and that PGDATABASE carries the exact requested value. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of the trailing positional database argument in the Backup tool before 9.18. | ||||