Export limit exceeded: 395228 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 395228 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (395228 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-85511 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-09-18 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in EAP's Elytron. An EAP application whose security domain is backed by an Elytron token-realm with oauth2-introspection would allow parameter substitution due to missing URL encoding. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82311 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Fab Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-fab | 2026-09-18 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user's password does not delete that user's existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user's integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim's session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them. Affects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions. apache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both. Users of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82310 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Fab Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-fab | 2026-09-18 | 7.2 High |
| Apache Airflow FAB provider: deactivating a user account does not stop tokens issued to that account before deactivation. Password authentication correctly rejects the disabled account, but the Core API continues to accept an existing, unexpired token naming it, and lets that token mint a replacement — so the account keeps its role-scoped access indefinitely after an administrator has disabled it. The user replays their own legitimate credential; no signature forgery or privilege escalation is involved, and the access stays within the roles the account already held. Affects deployments using Airflow 3 with the FAB auth manager and Core API token authentication, where an administrator deactivates an account whose row remains in the database and whose previously issued token has not expired. The trigger is administrative deactivation as a containment action, which silently fails to contain. Users of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which rejects tokens naming a deactivated account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77928 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ClipBucket v5 before 5.5.3-#182 contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users to extract arbitrary database contents by submitting the msg_id parameter as an array to bypass the clean_requests() sanitization function in ClipBucket.class.php. Attackers can pass unsanitized array elements through the deletion handler in private_message.php into cb_pm::delete_msg(), which interpolates the unescaped message ID directly into a SQL query string, enabling time-based blind SQL injection to retrieve all user credential hashes and email addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77927 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ClipBucket v5 before 5.5.3-#182 contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users to extract arbitrary data from the database by submitting the check_photo parameter as an array to bypass the clean_requests() sanitization function in ClipBucket.class.php. Attackers can pass unsanitized array elements through the bulk deletion handler in manage_photos.php to photo_exists() in photos.class.php, where non-numeric values are interpolated directly into a SQL query, enabling time-based blind SQL injection to retrieve credential hashes and other sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76187 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Keycloak Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-keycloak | 2026-09-18 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Airflow Keycloak provider: the unauthenticated token endpoint accepts a client-credentials grant for any confidential client registered in the Keycloak realm, not only the client configured for Airflow. No allowlist restricts which client ids may authenticate, so the credentials of an unrelated application that happens to share the realm are valid Airflow login credentials, and Airflow mints a signed session token for that application's service account. The endpoint also answers unauthenticated credential guesses against Keycloak under Airflow's identity. Affects deployments using the Keycloak auth manager whose realm is shared with other confidential clients. The attacker needs valid credentials for any one of those clients, not for Airflow. Resource authorization is still evaluated per subject, so the access gained is whatever that service account holds, plus any endpoint gated only on being authenticated. Users of apache-airflow-providers-keycloak are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0 or later, which accepts only the configured client on that grant. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75035 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-09-18 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. When a non-administrative caller supplied a label selector naming a different user, the ext.cattle.io/v1 Token store dropped its internal owner filter instead of returning an empty result. Any authenticated user could therefore list and watch every other user's tokens, disclosing token metadata and the stored salted hash of the bearer token. This issue affects Rancher: before 2.15.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76186 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Keycloak Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-keycloak | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| Apache Airflow Keycloak provider: from Airflow 3.3 the Keycloak auth manager takes a user's identity from the signed Airflow session token but takes the Keycloak access and refresh tokens used for every authorization decision from separate, unauthenticated cookies, and never checks that the two describe the same subject. A user who holds any valid Airflow login of their own, together with another subject's Keycloak access or refresh token obtained out of band, can pair the two: Airflow then authorizes requests with the foreign token's privileges while the session identity, audit log and cache keys continue to name the attacker's own account. The refresh path re-issues an Airflow session token for the original identity carrying the foreign tokens, so the mismatched pairing survives across sessions. Affects deployments running Airflow 3.3 or later with the Keycloak auth manager. Earlier versions carried the Keycloak tokens inside the signed session token, so the binding existed and was lost when they moved into separate cookies. Users of apache-airflow-providers-keycloak are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0 or later, which binds the cookie-supplied tokens to the session identity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75156 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Fab Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-fab | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| Apache Airflow FAB provider versions 3.7.3 through 3.8.0 do not validate the issuer or audience of Azure AD `id_token`s during OAuth login. Deployments are affected only when the FAB auth manager is configured with Azure AD as an OAuth provider. Because the signing keys are fetched from Microsoft's **multi-tenant** JWKS endpoint, an `id_token` minted in *any* Azure tenant — including one the attacker creates — passes signature verification, and the username and role assignments are then read from that attacker-controlled token. Anyone able to register an Azure tenant can therefore authenticate to the Airflow UI with no prior access to the deployment. The fix for **CVE-2026-59243** was incomplete, and this advisory closes the remaining gap: that fix made the provider verify the `id_token` signature, but did not add issuer or audience checks. Operators who already applied the CVE-2026-59243 fix are **still affected and must upgrade again** — 3.7.3 is the release that shipped that fix, so every version containing it falls inside this affected range. Upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-fab `3.8.1` or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86891 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Watchos | 2026-09-18 | 3.5 Low |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access Bluetooth device information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7406 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 9 more | 2026-09-18 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7405 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 9 more | 2026-09-18 | 5.5 Medium |
| A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-93567 | 1 Redhat | 11 Amq Broker, Apicurio Registry, Build Keycloak and 8 more | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| HTTP/1 authority-form CONNECT is translated to malformed HTTP/2 CONNECT with Host-controlled :authority | ||||
| CVE-2026-93660 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| SQLBot through 1.10.1 fails to verify dashboard ownership in update_resource and update_canvas endpoints, allowing authenticated workspace members to modify other users' private dashboards. Attackers can supply arbitrary dashboard IDs to rename dashboards and overwrite component data, canvas styles, and view information belonging to other workspace members. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93659 | 1 Nbubna | 1 Store | 2026-09-18 | 8.7 High |
| Concrete CMS Community Store before 2.7.8 renders customer-supplied order fields without HTML escaping in checkout and admin views. Unauthenticated attackers can store script payloads in billing name, email, or phone fields that execute in authenticated manager sessions to create rogue accounts or exfiltrate data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93658 | 1 Uutils | 1 Coreutils | 2026-09-18 | 7 High |
| uutils coreutils versions before 0.10.0 apply setuid or setgid mode to install destinations before finalizing ownership changes, allowing privileged users to leave setuid executables owned by the privileged invoker when ownership changes fail. Attackers can execute leftover setuid files with elevated privileges when ownership change operations fail on capability-restricted systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93657 | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High | ||
| hickory-resolver versions before 0.26.2 fail to propagate bogus DNSSEC proof states through the Resolver::lookup() and Resolver::lookup_ip() APIs, allowing invalid records to be returned as successful results. Attackers controlling the answering zone or positioned on the network path can have forged DNS records accepted as validated, bypassing DNSSEC authentication checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76000 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76190 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75993 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||