Export limit exceeded: 102046 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (102046 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-46054 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-16 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux: fix overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() access checks The existing SELinux security model for overlayfs is to allow access if the current task is able to access the top level file (the "user" file) and the mounter's credentials are sufficient to access the lower level file (the "backing" file). Unfortunately, the current code does not properly enforce these access controls for both mmap() and mprotect() operations on overlayfs filesystems. This patch makes use of the newly created security_mmap_backing_file() LSM hook to provide the missing backing file enforcement for mmap() operations, and leverages the backing file API and new LSM blob to provide the necessary information to properly enforce the mprotect() access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45998 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-16 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure If skb_unshare() fails to unshare a packet due to allocation failure in rxrpc_input_packet(), the skb pointer in the parent (rxrpc_io_thread()) will be NULL'd out. This will likely cause the call to trace_rxrpc_rx_done() to oops. Fix this by moving the unsharing down to where rxrpc_input_call_event() calls rxrpc_input_call_packet(). There are a number of places prior to that where we ignore DATA packets for a variety of reasons (such as the call already being complete) for which an unshare is then avoided. And with that, rxrpc_input_packet() doesn't need to take a pointer to the pointer to the packet, so change that to just a pointer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67388 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67385 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 8 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67384 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67381 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67380 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 (gdr) and 5 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19389 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2026-09-16 | 7.1 High |
| Multiple integer overflow and underflow vulnerabilities were found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-ugly ASF demuxer (asfdemux) when parsing header objects from crafted ASF, WMV, or WMA files. Insufficient validation of attacker-controlled length and size values can bypass bounds checks and cause out-of-bounds heap reads. This can result in application crash, denial of service, or limited information disclosure when untrusted media is processed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67376 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Sql Server 2017, Sql Server 2019, Sql Server 2022 and 1 more | 2026-09-16 | 7.5 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67370 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 (gdr) and 5 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66820 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 (gdr) and 5 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66819 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Sql Server 2017, Sql Server 2019, Sql Server 2022 and 1 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66818 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Improper privilege management in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66814 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (cu 31), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (cu 32) and 9 more | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| Insufficient granularity of access control in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86917 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-09-16 | 7.8 High |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to gain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43691 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-09-16 | 7.8 High |
| A path handling issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to gain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84568 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-09-16 | 7.8 High |
| A path traversal issue was addressed with improved path validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker with control of a network directory server may be able to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12728 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High |
| IBM MQ 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.37 LTS, 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.43 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.41 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.5.1 CD, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.25 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 CD, and 10.0.0.0 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a deserialization of untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61409 | 1 Dell | 3 Secure Connect Gateway, Secure Connect Gateway Appliance, Secure Connect Gateway Application | 2026-09-16 | 7.3 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Application, versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to remote execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79643 | 1 Dell | 3 Secure Connect Gateway, Secure Connect Gateway Appliance, Secure Connect Gateway Application | 2026-09-16 | 7.3 High |
| Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Use of Incorrect Operator vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. | ||||