Export limit exceeded: 54254 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (54254 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-115519 | 1 Knime | 1 Business Hub | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Missing security attributes on sensitive cookies in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise user sessions if other security issues such as a cross-site scripting vulnerability or a man-in-the-middle attack are present. A workaround is not possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114649 | 1 Mongodb | 1 C# Driver | 2026-11-02 | 6.8 Medium |
| The MongoDB C# Driver compares TLS client certificates by issuer and serial number only when deciding whether two clients can share cached connections. In an application that creates clients from certificates supplied by different users, a user who provides a certificate copying another user's issuer and serial number, without that user's private key, can be given connections authenticated with the other user's certificate. Database operations can then run under the other user's identity, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of data that identity can access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107858 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets (CWE-1385) and Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains (CWE-942) in the development web server (ADK Web) in Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) for Java (com.google.adk:google-adk-dev versions 0.1.0 before 1.13.0 and com.google.adk:google-adk-maven-plugin versions 0.3.0 before 1.13.0) allow a remote attacker to control a locally running agent and read its data via a malicious web page visited by a developer while the server is running. The /run_live WebSocket endpoint accepts connections from any origin by default (hardcoded via setAllowedOrigins("*") in versions 0.1.0 through 1.5.0, and defaulting to * via adk.web.cors.origins in versions 1.6.0 through 1.12.0), and since version 0.4.0 the REST API returns Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * by default. Because the server has no authentication and requests originate from the developer's browser (so binding to localhost does not prevent exploitation), a cross-origin page can send messages to the agent (triggering registered tools), stream agent responses, and list, read, create, or delete sessions and artifacts. In versions 1.6.0 through 1.12.0, users can mitigate the issue by setting the adk.web.cors.origins property to an explicit allowlist of trusted origins (such as http://localhost:8000). The vulnerability is fixed in version 1.13.0, which enforces a same-origin default for CORS and the /run_live WebSocket endpoint, and rejects DNS-rebinding requests over loopback. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83770 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-11-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Text Shaping allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83775 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-11-02 | 7 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83777 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-02 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Bluetooth Service allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over an adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83779 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83781 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 10 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.8 High |
| Improper null termination in Windows Program Compatibility Assistant Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83782 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-11-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83783 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Management Instrumentation allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102559 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 10 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-11-02 | 8.6 High |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. When constructing a masked WebSocket client frame for a very large outgoing payload, size values passed to GByteArray allocation APIs could be truncated while the masking routine still used the full length, causing a heap buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102558 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 10 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-11-02 | 8.6 High |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. When max-incoming-payload-size is unlimited (0), SoupWebsocketConnection could grow its incoming GByteArray based on an attacker-controlled frame length until the length wrapped, causing a heap buffer overflow while reading frame data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102557 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 10 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-11-02 | 8.6 High |
| A flaw was found in libsoup. When reassembling fragmented WebSocket messages into a GByteArray, libsoup did not adequately cap total message size against the limits of the underlying buffer type. A remote peer could send fragments that caused size truncation while the implementation still used the full length, leading to heap corruption or a crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96280 | 2 Flatpak, Redhat | 5 Flatpak, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 2 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.5 High |
| The OCI delta stream parser read sizes as guint64 but passed them to GLib I/O and allocation functions expecting gsize (32 bits on 32-bit systems), causing undersized allocations while subsequent operations use the original 64-bit size, leading to heap buffer overflows. An attacker controlling an OCI registry can craft a delta stream that triggers this during flatpak install/update, potentially achieving code execution on 32-bit systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84177 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Incorrect behavior order in Apache Wicket: a file path is validated before the framework appends the attributes that complete it. org.apache.wicket.request.resource.PackageResource asks the configured package resource guard about a path built from the scope class' package and the file name in the request URL, and then hands that same path to the resource stream locator together with a style, a variation and a locale. Those three attributes are decoded from the name of the first query parameter and never appear in the string the guard was given. org.apache.wicket.core.util.resource.locator.ResourceNameIterator appends them to that path, each preceded by an underscore, in the order variation, style, locale, before the file extension, so the file that is opened is not the file the guard approved. org.apache.wicket.markup.html.PackageResourceGuard decides whether an HTML file is a component's markup template by looking for a class file of the same name beside it, stripping one underscore-delimited suffix at a time as it goes. HTML is on the default allow list, so that check is the only thing separating a static HTML file, which may be served, from a markup template, which may not. Asked about the name of a template, the guard refuses it correctly. Asked about a shorter name for which no class exists, it accepts, and a style supplied in the URL then completes that name into the markup template of a component class, which is written to the response. An application is affected if the simple name of any of its component classes contains an underscore and no shorter part of that name is itself a class, such as Report_v2 or Wizard_Step1; an application with no such class name is not affected. No unusual deployment, packaging or configuration is required, and running in deployment rather than development mode does not prevent it. Java naming conventions discourage underscores in class names and no module Wicket ships has one, so no framework markup is exposed; what an application exposes this way is its own. A component whose class name has no underscore is not reachable, and neither is its localized or styled markup, because the guard finds the class file under the base name and refuses the request. The attributes cannot change the file extension and cannot leave the component's package, so nothing beyond HTML files in that package is reachable. Access is read-only, and what is disclosed is developer-authored template content: component structure, developer comments, markup that is rendered only under some conditions, inline script, and the endpoints a template names. No user data, credential or session material is reachable this way. An attacker has to name a class in the target package and the component itself, and Wicket writes fully qualified class names into the URL of every package resource it renders. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20595 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In neuropilot, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11263078; Issue ID: MSV-9001. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20590 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In display, there is a possible system crash due to a logic error. This could lead to local denial of service if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11410704; Issue ID: MSV-9574. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20594 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01349680 / MOLY01369097; Issue ID: MSV-9364. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20596 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01758225; Issue ID: MSV-8910. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20597 | 2 Mediatek, Mediatek, Inc. | 2 Mediatek Chipset, Mediatek Chipset | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01758223; Issue ID: MSV-8909. | ||||