Export limit exceeded: 398540 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (398540 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-83242 | 1 Oracle | 2 Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager, Commerce Guided Search \/ Oracle Commerce Experience Manager | 2026-09-27 | 7.3 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager product of Oracle Commerce (component: Experience Manager). The supported version that is affected is 11.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Commerce Guided Search / Oracle Commerce Experience Manager. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83279 | 2 Oracle, Oracle Corporation | 2 Agile Plm Mcad Connector, Oracle Agile Plm Mcad Connector | 2026-09-27 | 5.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: CAX Client). The supported version that is affected is 3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector executes to compromise Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-92126 | 2 Jenkins, Jenkins Project | 2 Script Security, Jenkins Script Security Plugin | 2026-09-27 | 7.2 High |
| Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not reject @Builder annotations whose builderStrategy member names an arbitrary class, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to execute code outside the sandbox if a suitable class is present on the classpath of the component that evaluates the script. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83282 | 2 Oracle, Oracle Corporation | 2 Business Intelligence, Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition | 2026-09-27 | 9.9 Critical |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Analytics (component: Platform Security). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-100745 | 1 Edimax | 1 Br-6428nc | 2026-09-27 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Edimax BR-6428nC 1.16. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /goform/formWizSurvey of the component Wireless Wizard Handler. The manipulation of the argument interface1/interface2 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83322 | 2 Oracle, Oracle Corporation | 2 Business Intelligence, Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition | 2026-09-27 | 7.2 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Analytics (component: Platform Security). Supported versions that are affected are 8.2.0.0.0 and 26.01.0.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-19708 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 File Manager | 2026-09-27 | 5.9 Medium |
| The File Manager WordPress plugin before 8.0.5 does not prevent unauthenticated users from downloading its database backup archives, and in some cases writes them under a fixed filename, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve a full database dump including every user's email address and password hash on servers that do not apply the directory's .htaccess file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100837 | 2026-09-27 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Contrast (Edgeless Systems) through 1.20.0 performs unanchored suffix matching when selecting per-registry configuration in the imagepuller. Config.registryFor strips a single trailing dot and then uses strings.HasSuffix(hostname, fqdn) without requiring a DNS label boundary, so a registry entry such as [registries."ghcr.io."] is also applied to any host whose name merely ends in that byte sequence, including attacker-registered domains such as evilghcr.io. When an image or layer is pulled from such a sibling domain, the imagepuller sends the configured Authorization header (basic auth, registry token, or identity token), trusts the configured custom CA bundle, follows the configured mirror, and honours insecure-skip-verify (disabling TLS verification) for that host. Image integrity is not affected, as image bytes remain pinned by digest in the policy and are validated after the pull. Configurations that use a leading dot (e.g., [registries.".example.registry"]) are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100836 | 2026-09-27 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Contrast through 1.20.0 contains a panic vulnerability in the transit-engine endpoint's ciphertextContainer.UnmarshalJSON function that fails to validate decoded ciphertext length before slicing. An authenticated workload with a valid mesh certificate can trigger a runtime panic by submitting a short base64-encoded ciphertext, causing log spam and request failures without crashing the process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100865 | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High | ||
| Heym before 0.0.53 contains multiple independent vulnerabilities. (1) The workflow condition evaluator uses Python eval() without an effective sandbox, allowing any user who can edit a workflow branch/condition node — or who can import a workflow template containing a malicious condition node — to execute arbitrary Python code as the backend process user when the workflow runs. (2) Slack webhook signature verification and (3) Telegram webhook secret-token verification fail open when the trigger node has no credentialId or an empty signing secret, allowing anyone who knows the public webhook URL to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials without authentication. (4) The OAuth authorization endpoint does not validate the redirect_uri scheme, so an attacker who registers a public OAuth client with a javascript: or data: redirect_uri and lures a victim to the consent screen receives the authorization code and executes attacker-controlled JavaScript in the Heym origin, including access to the victim's HttpOnly auth cookie. (5) WorkflowExecutionToken, PortalSession, HITLRequest.public_token, and OAuthAuthorizationCode values are stored in plaintext, so any database read exposure yields valid scoped bearer tokens, including portal and HITL tokens with a 168-hour TTL that permit workflow execution on behalf of the owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100864 | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High | ||
| heym before 0.0.91 contains a sandbox escape vulnerability in the expression engine's DotList map/filter and fallback resolver that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code. Attackers can craft workflow expressions using dunder attribute access through item expressions or the fallback resolver to access os.system and execute commands as the backend process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100863 | 2026-09-27 | 5 Medium | ||
| Heym versions 0.0.90 and earlier contain two server-side request forgery (SSRF) egress gaps, both remediated in app/services/ssrf_guard.py in 0.0.91. First, the LLM image-edit input loader (_load_image_bytes) fetched caller-controlled HTTP/HTTPS URLs with a bare httpx.get, applying only a scheme check and bypassing the egress-pinning HTTP client; because the workflow DSL supports "imageInput": "$userInput.body.imageUrl", a webhook or API caller can choose the fetch target when a workflow author uses that expression, allowing requests to loopback, RFC1918, and cloud metadata endpoints. Second, _is_public_address unwrapped only IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, so IPv6 transition forms — the NAT64 well-known prefix 64:ff9b::/96, deprecated IPv4-compatible ::x.x.x.x addresses, and 6to4 (2002::/16, classified as globally routable by Python 3.11.0 through 3.11.9) — could carry loopback, RFC1918, link-local, or cloud-metadata IPv4 destinations past both the initial URL validation and the dial-time IP pin. Version 0.0.91 routes the image loader through guard_http_url and the guarded client, evaluates NAT64 and IPv4-compatible addresses by their embedded IPv4 address, and refuses 64:ff9b:1::/48, 6to4, and Teredo (2001::/32) outright. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100862 | 2026-09-27 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| heym, a workflow automation platform, stores and returns multiple capability secrets in plaintext in versions prior to 0.0.91. Affected secrets include webhook header-auth values (returned in cleartext by GET /api/workflows/{id} and persisted unsanitized into execution history), MCP API keys (stored as a plaintext column, returned in config/list responses, and accepted via the ?key= query string so they leak into logs, proxies and Referer headers), portal session tokens (stored and validated by plaintext equality with a 168-hour TTL), workflow execution JWTs (stored in full and re-listed by GET .../execution-tokens), Discord interaction tokens (the full interaction body is stored in execution history), and global variables. A user with read access to a workflow, share/team membership, or anyone able to read the database, a backup, or logs can recover these secrets and replay them to execute workflows or act as the secret owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100861 | 2026-09-27 | 5 Medium | ||
| heym before 0.0.105 fails to apply egress guards to integration services that use credential-supplied base URLs, allowing authenticated users to bypass SSRF protections. Attackers can configure credentials pointing to loopback, private, or cloud-metadata addresses and read internal service responses returned as workflow node output. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100860 | 2026-09-27 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| heym before 0.0.105 does not act on the result of the credential authorization lookup in the Redis workflow node (backend/app/services/node_execution/nodes/redis_node.py). When _get_accessible_credential returns None — because the credential ID does not exist or the caller is not authorized to use it — the node treats the lookup failure as an empty configuration and falls back to defaults, connecting to localhost:6379 with no password and executing the requested operation there. The same fallback occurs when an accessible credential has an empty config or no redis_host value. An authenticated workflow author who supplies a credential ID they do not own, or one that was deleted, therefore obtains a read/write connection to whatever Redis is listening on the backend's loopback interface instead of an error. Impact depends on the deployment: the stock docker-compose.yml ships no Redis, in which case the flaw surfaces as a misleading connection error rather than data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100859 | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Heym before 0.0.106 contains a credential exfiltration vulnerability in the POST /api/credentials/test endpoint that allows collaborators with shared credential access to exfiltrate the credential owner's secret. Attackers can override the destination URL in the config parameter to cause the server to send decrypted authentication secrets to attacker-controlled endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100858 | 2026-09-27 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| heym before 0.0.109 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Slack, Discord, and Crawler workflow nodes. These nodes issue HTTP requests to URLs taken from user-created credentials (webhook_url / flaresolverr_url) using an unguarded HTTP client, bypassing the SSRF egress guard that already protects the HTTP, WebSocket, and MCP nodes; the credential API validates only that the URL is non-empty. Any registered user can create a credential pointing at an internal address and execute a workflow, causing the backend to reach loopback, private, link-local, or cloud-metadata endpoints and return the full response body in the node output (non-blind SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2026-100857 | 1 Azuracast | 1 Azuracast | 2026-09-27 | 8 High |
| AzuraCast before 0.23.4 contains a code injection vulnerability in the ConfigWriter::cleanUpString() method that fails to sanitize Liquidsoap string interpolation sequences, allowing authenticated users with Media or Profile permissions to inject arbitrary Liquidsoap code into station configuration. Attackers can inject #{process.run()} expressions into playlist URLs or station metadata fields that execute shell commands as the azuracast user when the station restarts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100856 | 1 Azuracast | 1 Azuracast | 2026-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| AzuraCast before 0.23.6 contains a code injection vulnerability in the remote relay password field due to incomplete migration from the vulnerable cleanUpString method to toRawString. Attackers with RemoteRelays station permission can inject nested Liquidsoap interpolation syntax to execute arbitrary code in the Liquidsoap process, disclose internal API keys, or disrupt station operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100855 | 1 Azuracast | 1 Azuracast | 2026-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| AzuraCast before 0.23.6 contains a missing permission check vulnerability in the GET /api/station/{station_id}/file/{id}/play endpoint that allows authenticated users to download media files from any station. Attackers can enumerate media files using sequential IDs and exfiltrate the complete media library of stations they lack permissions for. | ||||