Export limit exceeded: 418396 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418396 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-99270 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: Fix potential UAF in reqsk_timer_handler(). When TCP socket migration fails at inet_ehash_insert() in reqsk_timer_handler(), we jump to the no_ownership: label and free the new reqsk immediately with __reqsk_free(). Thus, we must stop the new reqsk's timer before jumping to the label, but the timer might be missed since the cited commit, resulting in UAF. As we are in the original reqsk's timer context, we can safely call timer_delete_sync() for the new reqsk. Let's pass false to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop() to stop the new reqsk's timer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76124 | 2026-11-03 | 8.8 High | ||
| The BuddyBoss App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.1 via the send_feedback function. This is due to insufficient file type validation that relies solely on the client-supplied Content-Type header without server-side content inspection or extension validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. While uploaded files are deleted after email transmission, a race condition exists during SMTP execution that allows access to the file, and files persist indefinitely when wp_mail() fails. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99247 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Do not initialize tracefs work if tracing is disabled If trace buffer allocation fails during early boot (e.g. in early_trace_init() -> allocate_trace_buffers()), tracing_disabled is left set to 1 and the global trace array events list remains uninitialized. Later during boot, tracer_init_tracefs() (invoked via fs_initcall) queues tracerfs_init_work asynchronously without checking if tracing was disabled. When tracer_init_tracefs_work_func() runs, it calls event_trace_init() and init_tracer_tracefs(&global_trace, NULL) unconditionally. This leads to __find_event_file() dereferencing an uninitialized tr->events list, causing an early boot NULL pointer dereference Oops: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000010 Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000485be0 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 7 [#1] ... NIP [c000000000485be0] __find_event_file+0x70/0x3c0 LR [c000000000448874] init_tracer_tracefs+0x274/0xc80 Call Trace: init_tracer_tracefs+0x274/0xc80 tracer_init_tracefs_work_func+0x50/0x320 process_one_work+0x1e8/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x1dc/0x3d0 kthread+0x194/0x1b0 start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18 Check tracing_disabled at the beginning of tracer_init_tracefs_work_func() and return immediately if tracing is disabled or failed to initialize, preventing the crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99251 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Drivers: hv: Avoid infinite retry loop in init_vp_index() There is a retry loop in init_vp_index() where the CPUs from a certain node are stripped out if they have already been in the allocated cpumask or not in HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask. If there is no CPU left, the allocated cpumask is ignored and the process is retried again. However, if the HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask turns out not to contain any CPU in that particular node, that will become an infinite retry loop. This particular problem was reported by sashiko [1]. This should rarely happen, but we still need to guard against this. Fix this infinite loop problem by also skipping NUMA node that has no housekeeping CPU in the inner while loop of init_vp_index(). Also update the early abort check to check for the absence of online housekeeping CPUs instead of just the emptiness of the cpumask. As the outer for loop will only be reached if the housekeeping cpumask has at least one online CPU, a NUMA node with housekeeping CPUs will eventually be found. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99253 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/cancel: rearm local work wake up before sleep io_uring_try_cancel_requests() sets ->cq_wait_nr to 1 so that the next io_req_local_work_add() wakes the cancelling task. The add that takes the count to zero is the only one that wakes, later ones see a count <= 0 and return. io_uring_cancel_generic() however only becomes TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE much later, so the one wake up can be spent on a running task. That is fine as long as the entry of that add is still queued, as the io_local_work_pending() check then skips the sleep. It is not if the add was delayed after queueing its entry: CPU0 (submitter in exec or exit) CPU1 (io_req_local_work_add) mpscq_push(req A) io_uring_try_cancel_requests() io_run_local_work() // runs req A io_uring_try_cancel_requests() atomic_set(&ctx->cq_wait_nr, 1) atomic_read(&ctx->cq_wait_nr) == 1 count taken, wake_up_state() // task is running, no-op prepare_to_wait(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) io_local_work_pending() == false schedule() mpscq_push(req B) cq_wait_nr <= 0, return Only the sleeping task can run req B, so it is stuck in execve() until a signal happens to wake it. An exiting task doesn't even get that. Arm the count again once the task state is set and before the work list is checked, for the rings whose local work this task is the one to run. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99254 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: don't flood a cancelling task with task_work io_ring_exit_work() asks each task which has used the ring to remove its tctx node, by task_work, and repeats that until the list is empty. io_tctx_exit_cb() doesn't touch the node while the task is in io_uring_cancel_generic(), which removes all the nodes at its end. So the work item queues the callback again as soon as it has completed, for nothing. That is more than a waste of time. task_work_run() only returns when it finds the list empty. If the rings are released from inside the cancellation, because requests of other rings held the last references to their files, up to 64 work items keep sending callbacks to the one task which is running them. It never finds the list empty, never gets back to the cancellation, the nodes stay, and so it goes on: a task with 60 pairs of rings which poll each other ran 280000 callbacks in 5 seconds, 20 seconds after exit_group(). It ends when all the senders happen to be late at the same time. Until then the task keeps a CPU and the work items busy. An exiting task can't be killed meanwhile. execve() cancels the requests in the same way, so a live task can get stuck there as well, for minutes. If it takes more than five, the work items run into the WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies, timeout)) of io_ring_exit_work(). No privilege is needed for any of this. If the callback has met a task in cancellation, wait a little before it is sent again. Nobody has to wake the work item up for that: either the node is gone by then, or it is the turn of the next round. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99258 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/hyperv: Avoid using per-cpu output page in hv_apicid_to_vp_index() hv_apicid_to_vp_index() currently uses the per-cpu hypercall input and output pages. This function is called when running in VTL2 and when running in an SEV-SNP CoCo VM with no paravisor. In the former case, the output page is allocated, but in the latter case it is not, so the hypervisor stores the output VP index in memory that has not been allocated by the guest. Fix this by using the input page for both input and output. The hypercall has very small input and output, so sharing the same page for both is straightforward. An alternative fix is to allocate the per-cpu output page when running in an SEV-SNP CoCo guest, but this uses significantly more memory, particularly with larger vCPUs counts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108060 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:CVE-2026-108060: Nombre in ‘/Trabajadores/Create’. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108059 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108059: Observaciones in ‘/Terceros/Create’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108058 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108058: Nombre in ‘/PlantillasMail/Edit’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108057 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108057: Nombre in ‘/PlantillasPdf/Edit/1273129’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108056 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108056: NombrePF in ‘/Empresas/Create’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108055 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108055: Nombre in ‘/Inmuebles/Create’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108054 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108054: Nombre in ‘/Familias/Edit/{id}’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108053 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108053: Nombre in ‘/CuentasCorrientes/Create’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108052 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108052: Codigo in ‘/CategoriasFicheros/Edit/{id}’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108051 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108051: Nombre in ‘/Articulos/Create’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108050 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows: CVE-2026-108050: ReferenceOtherParty in ‘/Documents/DeliveryNotes/Edit/{id}’; | ||||
| CVE-2026-108049 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Clickjacking vulnerability in the Alosuite web application. The affected login interface can be embedded in a web page controlled by an attacker because it does not implement adequate user interface protection mechanisms, such as the X-Frame-Options header or an appropriate Content-Security-Policy (frame-ancestors) directive. By tricking a victim into interacting with a malicious web page, an attacker can trigger unwanted actions within the Alosuite application embedded in the frame, which could compromise the integrity of user interactions and facilitate further attacks against authenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108048 | 1 Am System | 1 Alo Suite | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Vulnerability due to a lack of request limits in Alosuite’s password recovery functionality. The ‘/Account/resetPwd’ endpoint does not enforce adequate restrictions on the number or frequency of password reset requests sent for a single account. As a result, a remote attacker can repeatedly call the endpoint to generate an unlimited number of password reset emails addressed to a user, causing an email flood and enabling abuse of the password recovery mechanism. The absence of request limits or other controls against automation can harm legitimate users, consume application and email infrastructure resources, and facilitate automated attacks against the password recovery service. | ||||