| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_dns2 parameter. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_dns1 parameter. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Mcli functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formUpload() functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchupg functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formIpQos mac functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Host Guardian Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Internet Information Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack buffer overflow when processing TLS certificates with malformed distinguished names during channel connection establishment. |
| Numeric truncation error in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| A stack overflow in the gf_bifs_dec_node function (/bifs/field_decode.c) of GPAC Project/MP4Box before 2.5 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted MP4 file. |
| GIMP APNG File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.
The specific flaw exists within the parsing of APNG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-29400. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. An attacker could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the password functionality could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve code execution when the SafeEnhancement feature is enabled. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the log message functionality could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve code execution. |
