Export limit exceeded: 424711 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424711 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24481 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27079 | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the file creation process on the command line interface of AOS-8 Instant and AOS-10 AP could allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform remote code execution (RCE). Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying operating system leading to potential system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27078 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in a system binary of AOS-8 Instant and AOS-10 AP could allow an authenticated remote attacker to inject commands into the underlying operating system while using the CLI. Successful exploitation could lead to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27106 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| binance-trading-bot is an automated Binance trading bot with trailing buy/sell strategy. Authenticated users of binance-trading-bot can achieve Remote Code Execution on the host system due to a command injection vulnerability in the `/restore` endpoint. The restore endpoint of binance-trading-bot is vulnerable to command injection via the `/restore` endpoint. The name of the uploaded file is passed to shell.exec without sanitization other than path normalization, resulting in Remote Code Execution. This may allow any authorized user to execute code in the context of the host machine. This issue has been addressed in version 0.0.100 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2733 | 1 Mannaandpoem | 1 Openmanus | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in mannaandpoem OpenManus up to 2025.3.13. This affects an unknown part of the file app/tool/python_execute.py of the component Prompt Handler. The manipulation leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29534 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in PowerStick Wave Dual-Band Wifi Extender V1.0 allows an attacker with valid credentials to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. The issue stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input in the /cgi-bin/cgi_vista.cgi executable, which is passed to a system-level function call. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2983 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in Legrand SMS PowerView 1.x and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument redirect leads to os command injection. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30370 | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High | ||
| jupyterlab-git is a JupyterLab extension for version control using Git. On many platforms, a third party can create a Git repository under a name that includes a shell command substitution string in the syntax $(<command>). These directory names are allowed in macOS and a majority of Linux distributions. If a user starts jupyter-lab in a parent directory of this inappropriately-named Git repository, opens it, and clicks "Git > Open Git Repository in Terminal" from the menu bar, then the injected command <command> is run in the user's shell without the user's permission. This issue is occurring because when that menu entry is clicked, jupyterlab-git opens the terminal and runs cd <git-repo-path> through the shell to set the current directory. Doing so runs any command substitution strings present in the directory name, which leads to the command injection issue described here. A previous patch provided an incomplete fix. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.51.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3128 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 1 Smartrtu | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A remote unauthenticated attacker who has bypassed authentication could execute arbitrary OS commands to disclose, tamper with, destroy or delete information in Mitsubishi Electric smartRTU, or cause a denial-of service condition on the product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3154 | 1 Xpdf | 1 Xpdf | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, triggered by an invalid VerticesPerRow value in a PDF shading dictionary. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3189 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in DoWISP in versions prior to 1.16.2.50, which consists of an stored XSS through the upload of a profile picture in SVG format with malicious Javascript code in it. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32778 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Web-Check is an all-in-one OSINT tool for analyzing any website. A command injection vulnerability exists in the screenshot API of the Web Check project (Lissy93/web-check). The issue stems from user-controlled input (url) being passed unsanitized into a shell command using exec(), allowing attackers to execute arbitrary system commands on the underlying host. This could be exploited by sending crafted url parameters to extract files or even establish remote access. The vulnerability has been patched by replacing exec() with execFile(), which avoids using a shell and properly isolates arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3363 | 1 Hgiga | 1 Isherlock | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The web service of iSherlock from HGiga has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34073 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in stamparm/maltrail (Maltrail) versions <=0.54. A remote attacker can execute arbitrary operating system commands via the username parameter in a POST request to the /login endpoint. This occurs due to unsafe handling of user-supplied input passed to subprocess.check_output() in core/http.py, allowing injection of shell metacharacters. Exploitation does not require authentication and commands are executed with the privileges of the Maltrail process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34082 | 1 Igel | 1 Igel Os | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in IGEL OS versions prior to 11.04.270 within the Secure Terminal and Secure Shadow services. The flaw arises due to improper input sanitization in the handling of specially crafted PROXYCMD commands on TCP ports 30022 and 5900. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to a vulnerable device can inject arbitrary commands, leading to remote code execution with elevated privileges. NOTE: IGEL OS v10.x has reached end-of-life (EOL) status. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34117 | 1 Netis-systems | 1 Netcore Router Firmware | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in multiple Netcore and Netis routers models with firmware released prior to August 2014 due to the presence of an undocumented backdoor listener on UDP port 53413. Exact version boundaries remain undocumented. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted UDP packets to execute arbitrary commands on the affected device. This backdoor uses a hardcoded authentication mechanism and accepts shell commands post-authentication. Some device models include a non-standard implementation of the `echo` command, which may affect exploitability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34143 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in ETQ Reliance on the CG (legacy) platform. The application allowed login as the privileged internal SYSTEM user by manipulating the username field. The SYSTEM account does not require a password, enabling attackers with network access to the login page to obtain elevated access. Once authenticated, an attacker could achieve remote code execution by modifying Jython scripts within the application. This issue was resolved by introducing stricter validation logic to exclude internal accounts from public authentication workflows in version MP-4583. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34149 | 1 Shenzhen Aitemi | 2 M300, M300 Wifi Repeater | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A command injection vulnerability affects the Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater (hardware model MT02) during WPA2 configuration. The 'key' parameter is interpreted directly by the system shell, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root. Exploitation requires no authentication and can be triggered during wireless setup. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34150 | 1 Shenzhen Aitemi | 2 M300, M300 Wifi Repeater | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The PPPoE configuration interface of the Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater (hardware model MT02) is vulnerable to command injection via the 'user' parameter. Input is processed unsafely during network setup, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34151 | 1 Shenzhen Aitemi | 2 M300, M300 Wifi Repeater | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in the 'passwd' parameter of the PPPoE setup process on the Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater (hardware model MT02). The input is passed directly to system-level commands without sanitation, enabling unauthenticated attackers to achieve root-level code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41649 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit insufficient input validation to write data beyond the bounds of a buffer, potentially leading to a denial-of-service condition for the devices. | ||||